Skip to content
November 2, 2010 / compassioninpolitics

The Upcoming Revolution in Church Teaching

I think the church will soon move to a more experiential type of teaching. This won’t happen wholesale–the sermon and the current model of classrooms isn’t going away. But I think some interesting things are happening which suggests the world beyond the walls of church is a classroom, which while helpful is limited in geography, space, insularity and the model of teaching thinking within church walls includes.

I think early explorations into small groups and house churches suggest the proverbial walls are coming down. You’ve also seen a minor shift toward service as a REAL and LIVING part of the church service at the margins. Both of these shifts I think are profound.

This move by some will likely be criticized as:

1) silly
2) not ordered/not doctrinal (not “the model”)
3) entertainment or perhaps bending too much toward “seeker sensitive” movement.

All 3 of these are red herring or strawperson attacks on exercising Gods mission in creative ways which bring people to him. As such, I think each of these criticisms is unfair in turn. I think the model provided in Acts is one of support and uplift, rather than confining current pracitioners and believers like a procrustean iron maiden (which I’ll admit is probably an unfair characterization and hyperbolic, but I think the dramatic effect helps here). The inventive pragmatism of the rag-tag church planting and bootstrapping of the Apostles is pretty note worthy. If anything their model is certainly rugged and simple. But its one characterized by adaptation and re-newal, while not changing the fundamentals. The outright rejection of (most) all change in church leadership circles (which I will admit is waning….even dying) seems foreign to the. I think the Apostles pragmatism what characteristic of what I’d like to call “Biblical problem solving” which used human ingenuity and adaptation for Kingdom ends.

This Biblical pragmatism is not meant to challenge core doctrine or the crystal clear language from Jesus which goes in the opposite direction. I think though that the church may be in need of more people who stand in the door…and more Christians who shine the light by getting out of the proverbial salt shaker.

Extremes, Hyper-fundamentalism, and Christian Doctrine Cross-fire
Admittedly, most any doctrine, movement, or ideology can be pushed to an extreme (aka a hyper-fundamentalism), which runs counter. This is exactly the reason this sort of solution is called for.

It seems very odd indeed to me as a church goer of over 30 years, why it is that we might see this as more legitimate in youth ministry or in missions, but not in the church. I think some people in the church have indirectly turned themselves into door keepers on truth and doctrine…. This is especially troubling when multiple interpretations are legitimately in the text–when implied meaning (aka translation of the text) is critical for any resolution of the conflict (it might read better as “either resolution of the conflict”–in those cases its possible that BOTH solutions bare significant parts of the truth in Both/And fashion–instead of exclusive either or. Oddly I can’t remember any minister or church leader I’ve seen suggest a both/and solution to any interpretative conflict–that doesn’t mean that it hasn’t happened–just that its a rather rare occurance.).

In a dynamic world, we should never sacrifice core principles, but at the same time, those principles which we have artificially created and added to the text are certainly subject to amendment and adjustment.

One caveat: please don’t mischaracterize this for what it isn’t–it isn’t ethically without core–it isn’t emergent church–it isn’t Don Miller. Its just a call to re-evaluate how certain segments of the church look at church doctrine. Its a call for nuance in how differences in opinion and interpretation are grounded in humility rather than hubris. And by the way….these are just my two cents. I hope this helps in your walk and thoughts about the future direction of our community collectively called the church.

3 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. JCiliom / Nov 2 2010 3:12 am

    If we do not stray away from the truth itself then we are in pretty good shape. Regardless of the entertainment, Ministers must preach the word without trying to please anybode else, but God. In days before it was kept simple, but now we are in a new day and age and we have to reach out to others by any means necessary through Christ Walk. There is now Holy Hip Hop, R&B, Rock, etc. Also, there are many ministries to help reach out to so many. We can change the way we have church, as long as it is all done by the laws and principles of God’s Word.

  2. compassioninpolitics / Nov 2 2010 3:24 am

    Agreed in terms of staying principled and God focused. If outreach, evangelism, and teaching is grounded in God there isn’t a conflict. In the church, we imagine polarizing conflict when the conflict doesn’t exist in all cases. Being pro-outreach or pro-creativity doesn’t have to be anti-God or anti-Biblical, but I think in this case the church has borrowed from the conflicts that characterize politics–we allow Satan to use systems of ideology (and artificial polarities) to trap the churches’ mission and to trap the church in conflict which contravenes the principles of Ephesians 4 (among others).

    I think that the issue of economic stewardship and mission creep are issues that have to be considered in the case of paid artists (hip hop, rock, etc.).

    I’ve noticed some churches providing subsidies of sorts for groups which had missional goals–for instance prison or youth ministry (although that doesn’t limit the types of ministries that are possible)

    Elders and church leaders certainly have to make tough decisions with regards to budget….in addition to doctrine.

    Thanks for your comments…

  3. compassioninpolitics / Nov 2 2010 6:54 am

    On the issue of creative worship, I ran across interesting insight from Mark 12:30 on experiential worship (which I’m not sure what I feel about 100%, but do find an interesting issue of inquiry).

    “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength (Mark 12:30).

    Which brings up this potential reflective question from Bob Rognlien:
    “As you plan and lead the worship gatherings of your church, will you begin to intentionally consider how you can engage people intellectually, emotionally, volitionally, and physically?

    Bob Rognlien is senior pastor of Lutheran Chruch of the Good Shepherd in southern California

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 101 other followers