It seems to me, it should include Confessions by Augustine (probably considered more theology than philosophy, but it fits under both not just one). If Summa Theologica can be both, why not Confessions.
I might add some political philosophy or applied ethics to make to round out these resources.
The first one, in particular looks interesting. The second one seems radical in premise–to seemingly reject any distinction between two core types of argument.
Although as a learner and reader, its more than worth it to buy a book or two of Aristotle and a book or two of Plato or a broader reader with sections from classic philosophy.
Compassion in Politics: Christian Social Entrepreneurship, Education Innovation, & Base of the Pyramid/BOP Solutions 
Integrating texts
Click to access claims-chart.pdf
iPad stuff on Common Core (maybe a little off topic)
http://comphacker.org/comp/blog/2012/06/06/ipad-inquiry/
Probably falls under rhetoric, writing, and speech:
Click to access chapter1.pdf
Click to access chapter2.pdf
More classroom based:
http://www.educationrethink.com/2011/04/10-ways-to-help-students-ask-better.html
More at better classrooms–
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/html/icb.topic58474/TFTlectures.html
Philosophy:
http://www.luc.edu/philosophy/philosophylinks/
Key works of 7 philosophers:
http://www.luc.edu/philosophy/basic_ethics_reader.shtml
It seems to me, it should include Confessions by Augustine (probably considered more theology than philosophy, but it fits under both not just one). If Summa Theologica can be both, why not Confessions.
I might add some political philosophy or applied ethics to make to round out these resources.
Probably more appropriately just philosophy, but some phenemenological resources–need to track more of this down:
Another one to file under “philosophy” (and to be read later)
http://www.academia.edu/1660583/By_the_Content_of_their_Character_Christian_Love_and_Virtue_Ethics_in_Martin_Luther_Kings_Writings
http://www.academia.edu/201043/Forgiveness_Anger_and_Virtue_in_an_Aristotelean_Perspective
http://www.academia.edu/483652/Hegel_and_Religion_The_Second_Enlightenment
http://www.academia.edu/199761/A_Personalist_Aspect_of_Saint_Anselms_Platonist_Metaphysics
Also:
http://www.academia.edu/202417/Continental_Philosophy_Catholicism_and_the_Exigencies_of_Responsibility_The_Resources_of_Maurice_Blondels_Works
Also, the contributions of a Loyola prof to Christian theology
Design thinking
http://www.101designmethods.com/
See also my posts on design thinking:
https://compassioninpolitics.wordpress.com/?s=design+thinking
Looks interesting/could be useful for design thinking:
http://www.unfinishedbusiness.is/
http://designingforgrowthbook.com/
There is also a design thinking course on Coursea on innovation.
See also the Stanford YouTube Channel
Argument more broadly–fixing the logical fallacies:
http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3035/2419
http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2577
(there are probably more articles on this point)
More on logic & informatity, etc…
http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2572
http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2570
The first one, in particular looks interesting. The second one seems radical in premise–to seemingly reject any distinction between two core types of argument.
Overall the breakdown of their archives:
http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/issue/archive?issuesPage=2
Cool–sort of research oriented:
http://wiki.learnstream.org/wiki/
Found some article on meta-cognition here.
Critical thinking/argument:
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~digger/305/criteria.htm
http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/crit_think/
More critical thinking/argument:
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~digger/305/assumptions2.html
http://eserver.org/courses/spring2000/76101c/logic.html
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~digger/305/toulmin_model.htm
Click to access Annotated_Bibliography_on_Writing_Courses.pdf
Critical thinking/argument:
http://www.mesd.k12.or.us/si/Pennys_PortaPortal_Docs/ProfDevelMods/ArgumentWritingMod1
Decent….
http://logical-critical-thinking.com/critical-thinking/10-ways-or-techniques-to-help-improve-critical-thinking/
Might be worth doing work on the Halpern model:
Click to access McGuinness.pdf
Value of debate:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-shmuly-yanklowitz/a-society-with-poor-criti_b_3754401.html
Suber’s Guide to Philosophy:
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/philinks.htm
Philosophy Pages
http://www.philosophypages.com/ph/index.htm
Ethics Update (not sure this one is working)
Phil Papers here:
http://philpapers.org/
This probably belongs under coaching, but I can rationalize it being here:
Click to access Web_site_MAPS_Model_Application_Series_Cover.pdf
Philosophy outlines:
http://www.niu.edu/~gpynn/index.html
Debate (and Critical thinking)
http://debate.uvm.edu/debateheritage.html
This is secular–even atheist/agnostic in orientation:
http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Rationality_materials
Profiles in Courage (education curriculum):
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Education/Profile-in-Courage-Essay-Contest/Curriculum-Ideas.aspx
(Not sure where to file this exactly.)
Philosophy Section of Course World:
http://www.courseworld.org/home/view_category/1/55
More under rhetoric or communication, but:
Click to access Mannebach%20Making%20Lang.pdf
One way to think about things critically–ethnography & anthropology:
http://figuringoutmethods.wikispaces.com/readings
Philosophy:
His critique of relativism:
http://as.nyu.edu/object/paulboghossian.html
His defense of relativism:
Click to access relativism.pdf
Although he’s not a full-scale relativist (he believes in democracy as a public policy/public value)
Public Forum Debate:
http://www.pfdebate.com/
More about writing/persuasion–mostly aimed toward HS or potentially college, but potentially an application beyond those bounds:
http://www.contentextra.com/bacconline/OnlineResources/EnglishA/Worksheets.aspx
More about Continental theory:
http://www.american-philosophy.org/archives/past_conference_programs/pc2001/Discussion%20papers/david_mcclean.htm
LD Debate:
http://webpages.charter.net/johnprager/LD_index.html
Thought this was potentially thought provoking
Could file this under communication, history, or critical thinking–units on history:
http://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/alphabetical-list-of-units/
More the issue of thinking + self-reflection:
http://www.positivityblog.com/index.php/2013/11/20/how-to-stop-overthinking/
Latin Library (ie Cicero, etc..)
http://www.thelatinlibrary.com
Possible links–this is specifically about meta-cognition:
http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/564Web.htm
Critical thinking:
http://www.skilledup.com/learn/openu/learn-philosophy-online-free/
Argument/Rhetoric and argument topoi (informal argument):\
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~goodwin/
Jean Goodwin page too.
Interesting poster for logical fallacies:
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/
A course on philosophy:
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/reading/assign.html
Free E-texts for the course:
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/e-text.html
This is more communication perhaps, but:
http://pivotalthinking.wordpress.com/tag/ladder-of-inference/
Systems thinking:
Critical thinking:
About a dozen downloads on critical thinking from Edutopia:
http://www.edutopia.org/stw-kipp-critical-thinking-resources-downloads?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=post&utm_campaign=STW-critical-thinking-downloads-repost
Composition links:
http://bb.bedfordstmartins.com
http://comppile.org/search/comppile_main_search.php
See also ERIC.
See also typical rhetoric links (e-server & writing resources)
See also critical thinking/reasoning rubric
Winston Churchill Speeches:
http://www.winstonchurchill.org/
I’ve overlapped communication and critical thinking a great deal….and yet another example
http://burton.byu.edu
* Note: this is a BYU professor.
I haven’t read his pubs yet, but this guy seems to be pro objectivity versus relativism:
http://jasonstanley.commons.yale.edu
Pop Culture & Science:
http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2014/01/22/daniel-goleman-focus-10000-hours-myth/
Critical thinking:
http://blogs.worldbank.org/publicsphere/anecdotes-and-simple-observations-are-dangerous-words-and-narratives-are-not?cid=EXT_WBBlogSocialShare_D_EXT
HS Debate–LD
http://hsld.debatecoaches.org/bin/WebHome
Outline for speech class:
http://www.rhetoricring.com/courses/rhetoric-course/lecture-notes/
Literary Devices in the Bible
Click to access Literary%20Devices%20in%20the%20Bible.pdf
MLK:
http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/speech-analysis-dream-martin-luther-king/
MLK & Dream:
http://www.duarte.com/blog/communicate-like-mlk-and-change-the-world/
http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2013/08/28/nancy-duarte-mlk-speech/
Obama speech analysis:
http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/inauguration-speech-analysis-barack-obama-inaugural/
Cognitive Distortions:
Click to access COGNITIVE_0.pdf
History stuff that I assume is pretty good.
http://www.historyguide.org/
MLK speech videos (really just audio I think):
http://vimeo.com/sweetspeeches/videos
Argumentative paper micro-learning:
http://catlintucker.com/2013/08/common-core-teaching-argument-informational-paragraph-writing/
Questioning circles:
http://edtheory.blogspot.com/2012/10/going-around-in-questioning-circles.html
Thinking about context–haven’t fully thought this one through–but thought it was in principle interesting:
http://jacksonwu.org/2014/01/22/what-is-the-context-of-scripture/
The glossary here:
http://www.thwink.org/
Categories:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/categories/
Articles on Critical Thinking:
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/index-of-articles/1021/
Strategies manual for download:
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/6-9th-grade-strategies/1145
Books available for purchase:
http://www.criticalthinking.org/store/
Potentially interesting–seems like a paid service for lesson plans:
http://www.e-enlightenment.com/
But uniquely academic. Not sure about any ideological slant.
Doing philosophy:
http://guweb2.gonzaga.edu/faculty/alfino/cfma/courses/304/index.cfm?semester=201445
Critical thinking with texts/Rhetoric:
Click to access item34401.pdf
Argument:
sites.google.com/site/arguinginpublicwrt255/
Two to think about in terms of rhetoric and/or debate:
http://badrhetoric.com/
http://www.progymnasmata.net/
Rhetoric/assumptions:
web.cn.edu/kwheeler/resource_rhet.html
Home schooling:
http://www.classical-homeschooling.org/celoop/1000.html
http://www.homeschoolchristian.com/curricula/character/charverses.php
http://www.learner.org/workshops/workshop_list.html
Main page may have some literary works. not sure.
Documents for analysis (I think mostly historical):
The resources section includes some curriculum.
American History:
http://millercenter.org/president
Social change speeches:
http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/speeches/
History
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/
* they also have a resources section
Creativity:
http://creativiteach.me/
Toulmin model:
Critical thinking & speeches/texts/lectures:
librivox.org/
Critical thinking & writing:
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/3-strategies-improve-student-writing-ali-parrish?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=post&utm_campaign=blog-3-strategies-improve-writing-link
Assignment bank (possibly interesting):
http://assignments.ds106.us/
http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/aristotle.htm
File under critical thinking, persuasion, and coaching/consulting
This is critical thinking and persuasion:
http://books.google.com/books?id=fbHBBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA39&lpg=PA39&dq=what+is+the+purpose+of+eikos&source=bl&ots=NL1iitaNpc&sig=4fp_y4FdFviLJU4sEw_ris_O7-w&hl=en&sa=X&ei=U793VLzmFcWcNqC3hJAJ&ved=0CCUQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=what%20is%20the%20purpose%20of%20eikos&f=false
Not sure how good or interesting this is–but it does look interesting and/or potentially useful.
Summary of Rhetoric:
http://www.1902encyclopedia.com/R/RHE/rhetoric.html
Argument and Debate:
https://www.phc.edu/rr_logic_d.php
Trivium and Logical Thinking–
This is about 10 activities before 10:
http://www.triviumpursuit.com/articles/ten_to_do_before_ten.php
They also include a list of Christian logic texts.
This is one of the key lists from that Trivium website mentioned above:
http://www.triviumpursuit.com/articles/
Hmmmm….Philosophy:
http://philosophyforlife.org/
His ted talk is about how CBT is rooted in philosophy.
Here are some interesting/helpful texts:
http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/texts.html
Click to access smith1759.pdf
This list of characteristics is quite helpful:
http://www3.wooster.edu/teagle/creativity_characteristics.php
Both of these skill sets is important:
http://www3.wooster.edu/teagle/vendiagram.php
Databases of information–re: history of europe:
http://krieger.jhu.edu/singleton/resources/index.html
Speech Analysis
http://mannerofspeaking.org/speech-analyses/
Possibly helpful–this is a roundtable on famous speeches:
This is about learning more than “critical thinking” proper:
http://learningfromexperience.com/research/
On Writing:
http://personalwriting2.blogspot.com/
Some Christian reflections on critical thinking:
http://www.wilsdomain.com/blog/books/23-kindle-books-by-doug-erlandson-ph-d-sold-on-amazon/
LD Debate:
http://hsld.debatecoaches.org/
Literature, perhaps with a faith-based approach:
http://www.ignatius.com/promotions/ignatiuscriticaleditions/
Rhetoric Resources:
http://ishr-web.org/aws/ISHR/pt/sp/resources
World famous orations:
http://www.bartleby.com/268/
Inaugural addresses of the Presidents:
http://www.bartleby.com/124/
Rhetorical Terms:
Making an argument summary:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/04/
I’m not sure if I’m picking this primarily due to the inclusion of a number of key debate cites at the top of the article, but none-the-less interesting:
http://www.brilliant-insane.com/2015/01/15-great-resources-teaching-controversy-rhetoric-argument-writing.html
Not critical thinking per se, more history and inspiration and heros:
http://www.mcguffeyreaders.com/sower.htm
Elenor Roosevelt documents:
http://www.gwu.edu/~erpapers/documents/
Including a purpose of education–for citizenship.
US History Documents and other:
http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/
Philosophy of Happiness
http://philoshap.blogspot.com/
Meaning, purpose, ????
Critical thinking/Systems theory/coaching:
http://www.donellameadows.org/systems-thinking-resources/
Quotes from Ravi Zacharias Christians:
http://www.azquotes.com/author/16119-Ravi_Zacharias
There is one in the list who isn’t a Christian near the bottom (in the pictures).
This belongs under apologetics, but its going here:
http://www.symposiachristi.com/
Literary/Poetry options.
For instance this entry on Jonathan Swift:
http://www.todayinliterature.com/biography/jonathan.swift.asp
Other resources:
http://www.readwritethink.org/
English Resources:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~acurzan/english.html
Worth investigating at other universities, perhaps Christian universities
Cognitive biases:
http://www.businessinsider.com/cognitive-biases-that-affect-decisions-2015-8
Criteria of arguments:
Click to access Quality%20Argumentation%20and%20Epistemic%20Criteria.pdf
This is about scientific argument, however there are some forms for creating argument
Click to access PB304Xweb.pdf
This is a report on reading at universities. The book list starts on p.150, which I think is one of the most significant uses of the report:
Click to access NAS-BeachBooks2014-16_Full_Report.pdf
Poetry/Rhetoric:
https://poemshape.wordpress.com/
This might help:
http://www.classicalconversationsbooks.com/
https://www.classicalconversations.com/
This might help too:
https://www.classicalconversations.com/article/getting-it-all-done-ten-tips-classical-conversations-veteran
Basics of writing:
https://web.calstatela.edu/faculty/jgarret/paragraphs.htm
Helpful documents:
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/50docs/
Critical thinking content:
http://www.school-for-champions.com/speeches/resources.htm#.WAeaOJMrJuU
http://www.school-for-champions.com/speeches.htm#.WAeabJMrJuU
This is a good resource for texts:
http://www.loebclassics.com/
Although as a learner and reader, its more than worth it to buy a book or two of Aristotle and a book or two of Plato or a broader reader with sections from classic philosophy.
Writing/levels of thinking:
http://criticalthinkeracademy.com/courses/a-essays/lectures/315807
This probably doesn’t fit and is aimed at probably middle schoolers:
http://horrible-histories.co.uk/
I don’t know whether to file this under critical thinking or communication, but this classics reading list is quite impressive:
Click to access Santa_Fe_2016-2017_Undergraduate_Seminar_Reading_List.pdf
Here is a classical reading list:
Here is a Great Books class:
http://dt.pepperdine.edu/courses.htm
The one I looked at seemed to focus on challenges to the faith, so those might be approached with caution.
An interesting possibility. Aristotle and Plato:
http://hume.ucdavis.edu/mattey/phi102/contents.html
Four ways to read a historical document:
http://teachinghistory.org/teaching-materials/teaching-guides/25690
This is a liberal and secular and perhaps agnostic or atheist source (very important to recognize):
http://argumentninja.com/
Particularly, 9, 10, and possibly 13. The notion of the argument matrix intrigues me a bit.
Online philosophy course (not sure what ideology the teacher comes from):
Critical thinking. May have some insights: