Answering the assumptions of a question on Quora

I can see why you’d think or say that….but if you take a step back and look at the bigger picture–its an answer that makes more sense.

Answering it at the very level of the question….seems to try to answer the question from the level of humans. You have to answer the question from the level of God….or at least above or on a deeper level.

Daniel is answering the question….just not in the way you want him to. He’s answering it at the assumptive and worldview level. Those are the very grounds and fundamentals of where the question came from….not considering those is a failure to answer the question.

God made possible ethics and morality. There isn’t any possibility for them outside him. The very existence of ethics points toward God.

Ultimately, Daniel answered the spirit of the question–the core question that was being asked.

Systems of thought are not facts or math…..as much as they are rivers and systems like trees. Daniel is talking about the deep roots….you are talking about an individual leaf. Its still answering the question of why the tree & what makes up the tree & how does it function?